FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Cisco sued over IPTV set-top box patent

Tools

An Illinois man is suing Cisco Systems over alleged false patent marking--allegedly continuing to market products with expired patent information on them. Specifically, the suit targets Cisco IPN330HD IPTV set-top box. However, the lawsuit is one of several that the man, Thomas Simonian, has filed against many companies, in an effort, it seems, to keep companies honest about their patent information (Citizen's arrest!). However, if Simonian wins in court, he also stands to potentially split millions of dollars in damages with the federal government.

Some media reports on the suit suggest that lawsuits like this are on the increase as individuals look for gaps in corporate patent information. Instead, they may help make the case for much-needed patent reform.

For more:
- Network World has this post

Related articles
Cisco bought Scientific-Atlanta in 2005
Verizon Business becomes Cisco UC master
Cisco unveils next-gen router to speed online video


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceIPTV Email Newsletter:

Comments (1) | Post a comment
More stories about Patent Reform   IPTV   Cisco Systems   set-top boxes   patent lawsuit  

Comments

"Instead, they may help make the case for much-needed patent reform." Lets look at this carefully, members of the Coalition for Patent Piracy & Fairness like Cisco are routinely sued and lose because they acre caught selling patent properties which belong to others. Now they have been caught red handed breaking marking laws. So tell me why stealing small companies inventions or being caught misrepresenting what is valuable about their products is cause to change the law? Following the same reasoning should we change law to allow pickpockets, car thieves, robbers, etc. to also have free reign to do what they want? Why is it that petty crime should be prosecuted while larceny on the grandest of scales such as what we have experiences from banking, insurance and YES tech companies who also happen to be members of the Coalition for Patent Piracy and Fairness get a free pass to do much worse? Ronald J. Riley, I am speaking only on my own behalf. Affiliations: President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org Senior Fellow - www.PatentPolicy.org President - Alliance for American Innovation Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel Washington, DC Direct (810) 597-0194 / (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 8 pm EST

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.