FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideoFierceCable

Conn. ruling leaves AT&T with cable TV designation

Tools

It has been nine months since AT&T got the green light for a statewide video franchise in Connecticut, but the saga of its search for the right legal and business conditions to operate in the state continues to play out. Late last week, a Connecticut judge dealt the telco's efforts another blow when she backed an earlier court decision that defined AT&T's U-verse offering as a cable TV service.

This controversy has been playing out for the last two years, when Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control declared that AT&T's services should not be defined as cable TV because they are based on Internet technology. AT&T has argued that the statewide video franchise given it by the Connecticut legislature last fall renders the debate over definitions moot. That franchising law does not take into account whether a service is defined as cable TV or something else.

The issue likely will remain hot until the Federal Communications Commission weighs in on whether or not AT&T's video efforts fall under the governance of federal Cable Act.

For more:
- read this report at Multichannel News

Related articles:
AT&T's path for a statewide video franchise was cleared last fall. AT&T report
AT&T recently targeted Tennessee for a U-verse roll-out. AT&T report


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceIPTV Email Newsletter:

Be the first to comment
More stories about Connecticut Legislature   Cable Act   IPTV   AT&T   Federal Communications Commission   U Verse  

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.