FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideo

Update: TelcoTV Conference reviews mixed

Thanks for the comments below, Tim. Here's the update as promised: UPDATE: I’m still waiting on final numbers from CMP and Shorecliff, but anecdotal reports indicate the show’s attendance climbed from an approximate 2,300 attendees last year to closer to 3,000 this year, no small feat. Indeed, most executives I spoke with agreed TelcoTV is the premier show for all things IPTV. Some even like the venue, but I must humbly disagree with that sentiment—San Diego offered much more in the way of nightlife, and the venue accommodated the attendees with more space and fewer floor changes. So it's a mixed bag of reviews, as is the case with most shows. To hear the "old-timers" who attended the original show six years ago, which they tell me, consisted of a congregation of maybe 200 people around a few large tables. And as always, what's really important is the content. The show has provided grat fodder for discussion--my meetings were all charged with energy, mostly because of the surge in interest in Internet TV--it's certainly spread to TelcoTV, too. Original Post: CMP recently acquired Shorecliff Communications, which is the company largely responsible for the TelcoTV show. Some industry trade groups help with the content, too. Many attendees are not happy with the show this year--less so than last year. Here are a few common gripes: Some of the panels only have two speakers on them, and word is it's not by choice. The press room was also lacking a sponsor which is highly unusual for a conference of this sort. (I don't blame them, the press room is tiny compared to last year's.) I also heard attendance is down, but I don't have the exact figures yet, so I'll hold off from making leaping declarations there. On a final note, the conference is not in Dallas, Texas as I have said before. It's in Grapevine, Texas. We are a full 26 miles from the city, a fact not lost on attendees according to the taxi drivers here. They said passengers have been complaining all day about the convention center complex we're all trapped in out here in the 'burbs.
More stories about TelcoTV 2006 Coverage  

Comments

I heard our booth at Telco TV was very busy throughout the show. Probably because IP-PRIME is for real (www.ip-prime.tv).
Interesting comments about TelcoTV, because the writer obviously isn't at the show. I am the co-founder of Shorecliff and now with CMP -- the TelcoTV show this year was by far the largest and most well-attended in all its years, since I launched it 5 years ago. The comments above couldn't be further from the truth -- as evidenced by the growth in registered attendees, the exhibitors who have signed on again for next year, and the comments and feedback we receive from our customers. We'll announce final numbers and feedback on all categories in the next two days, but the sentiment we've heard from the people here in Dallas today, is nothing but positive.
Tim - Someone says something remotely negative about your show and your response is to question their integrity? Of course Fierce is at the show. Are you questioning the posts they have had all day or only the ones that don't paint the show in a positive light?
Tim -- I, for one, know that Brian was at the show. It seems a bit unfair to jump to the conclusions that you did.
I think the company that had the biggest coming out party was Espial IPTV. Their booth just rocked and I was impressed by the new Evo Server.
Comment #5 (anonymous) is a plug for Espial. Sell it, baby!
I have attended the show for the past three years and I agree whole-heartedly with the aforementioned FierceIPTV review. The show was lacking in depth and insight. For me, as well as my cohorts, nothing new was gained! It's certainly questionable if we will attend next year?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 7 + 2?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.